Pursuant to California Vehicle Code (CVC)
40902, I respectfully submit this Trial By Written
Declaration to the Court. I plead Not Guilty to the charge of CVC 22454 A.
As required, I had paid online for $626.00 of bail
payment (copy of the online payment).
Please refund $626.00 in the event the court finds me not guilty.
On the morning of January 20th, 2009, I was driving my
car, 2005 Toyota Camry LE, to work on the southbound of Cherry Ave. Around 7:03 AM, I pulled into the gas
station, ExxonMobil, to fill up my car which located at the southeast corner of
N Cherry Ave and East Del Amo Blvd (IMAGE 6 and IMAGE
9). After filled up my car around 7:08
AM (IMAGE 10A and IMAGE 10B), I drove back on to the North Cherry Ave which
intersects with East San Antonio Dr (IMAGE 5 and IMAGE 2) and was waiting to
make a U-turn back on to the S Cherry Ave to continue back on route to
work. At that time, both North and South
Cherry Ave were still at the green light and there was quite a lot of traffic
on the southbound of Cherry Ave.
After I waited until the traffic on the S Cherry Ave was
cleared, I safely initiated a U-turn (IMAGE 2 and 9). Once I started making a U-turn, I saw a
school bus turning from E Del Amo Blvd into S Cherry
Ave (IMAGE 1); this is a normal school bus route. Normally, the school bus comes to pickup
students at this location around 7:10 AM – 7:15 AM (IMAGE 3). Since I was in the middle of the U-turn, I
continued to complete the U-turn. By the
time I completed the U-turn and facing S Cherry Ave on the lane #2 (middle
lane), I saw that the school bus had already pulled up to the right side of my
car. Since my car was just finishing a
U-turn, the speed was less than 10 mph at that time. Therefore, I started to accelerate while the
school bus was pulling to curve at the Bus Stop where the students were waiting
to get into the bus.
While I looked toward the front of my car, I saw that the
last cars on all three lanes of the earlier traffic had just passed by the
parked officer car which located on the right hand side of the street
approximately 1000 feet away from the school bus (IMAGE 7 and 8). While continued accelerating my car, I
glanced at rear view mirror and saw a motorcycle following the back of my car
about 10 feet away. Next, I continued my
glance motion to the right side of my car toward the school bus. By that time, my car was already half way in
front of the school bus; I saw the front of the school bus and students started
to walk toward the bus. Before I moved
my head back to the front, I saw a STOP SIGN on the
back side of the school bus through my passenger side view mirror was slowly
starting to unfold. By that time, my car
was completely in the front of the school bus.
At that time, I continued to drive on the S Cherry Ave before safely
making a lane change to the lane #1 (outside lane). Until I passed the officer's car on the
right, I saw the officer's car was slowly pulling out from the curve. Then, I looked at my rear view mirror and saw
that the officer's car pulled up behind the motorcycle which was still on the
lane #2. At that time, the officer made
another lane change to the back of my car, turns on the lights and pulled me
over. So, I pulled over and stopped in
front of the park (IMAGE 8).
The officer informed me about the violation and the
reason he pulled me over. Then, I
explained to him the situation as described above. After the ticket was given by the officer
(IMAGE 14A and 14B), he continued to talk and ask me a few questions which I
continued to explain to him the situation as described above. However, the officer did not acknowledge that
he had seen my car making the U-turn. In
addition, the officer described to me that he saw the school bus making a right
turn from San Antonio Dr to S Cherry Ave in conflict of what I described to
him. Therefore, I strongly believe that
this could have been that the officer may not have a clear line-of-sight from
his location relative to my car location when the school bus was stopped (IMAGE
4 and 7). Furthermore, since I was
driving safely and cautiously, the location, speed, and direction of my car
were not posted any immediate danger in relation of where the school bus
stopped.
In addition, in the officer report Log, he indicated that
my car was in lane #1 (IMAGE 13C). Since
I was making a U-turn, it was not possible to be in the #1 lane at that time
due to the limitation of the car turn radius.
In addition, the Informal Discovery
Request was sent on February 12, 2009 (IMAGE 11A, 11B, 11C, and 11E) and March
6, 2009 (IMAGE 12A, 12B, 12C, 12D, and 12E) and my right has already been
violated pursue to California Penal Code Section 1054.5(b) and California Penal
Code Section 19.7. The first Informal
Discovery Request was sent on February 12, 2009 did not get any response back
from the Long Beach Police Department.
However, the Long Beach Courthouse responded with a letter indicating
that the ticket was not in the system (IMAGE 11D). One week later, I received a Courtesy Notice
and decided to send Informal Discovery Request with a copy of Courtesy Notice
the second time (IMAGE 12D). The second
Informal Discovery Request was sent on March 6, 2009 and got the respond back
with incomplete information; I only
received a copy my original IDR, front copy of the Notice to Appear (IMAGE
13A), a copy of intersection drawing with two words written down (IMAGE 13B),
and a copy of the Officer Log (IMAGE 13C and 13D). However, the Long Beach Courthouse did not
respond back to Informal Discovery Request at all.
While I could understand the reason the officer pulled me over, I
believe this is a very unfortunate situation, and it does not reflect my
driving behavior. Thank you for your
understanding and I wish you could find me not guilty.
If the court finds me guilty, I request a Trial de Novo,
and an option to attend traffic school level one and have the fine reduced.
In addition, please send me the “Decision and Notice of
Decision” (TR-215) by mail.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the
State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
Date:
_____________________________
M
Copper, Defendant in Pro Per